Something Rotten In Denmark:

A Word of Caution About The Danish Korean Rights Group (DKRG) For Other Korean Adoptees. Why Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han Are A Danger To The Korean Adoptee Community.

DKRG “Leader” Peter Møller (Inexplicably) Now Co-Leads KoROOT As Of February 2024.

+

ANATOMY OF A HIT JOB:

How DKRG’s Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han
(한분영) Pushed Me Out Of The Movement + Then Gave False Credit For My Research Into KSS K-Numbers To A Member of DKRG.

Peter Møller Knowingly
Falsely Attributed Paperslip’s Original KSS K-Number Research To Bastiaan Flikweert (신서빈) on January 1st, 2023.

Bastiaan Flikweert Did Not Publicly Admit He Had NO Role In Our Original KSS K-Number Research Until February 17th, 2024 - Over One YEAR Later.

+

DKRG Continues To Routinely BLOCK Korean Adoptees From DKRG Forums Who Have Active Truth and Reconciliation (TRC) Cases.

Something Rotten In Denmark:

A Word of Caution About DKRG For Other Korean Adoptees. Why Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han Are A Danger To The Korean Adoptee Community.

DKRG’s Peter Møller (Inexplicably) Now Co-Leads KoROOT As Of February 2024.

Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who Guards The Guards?

Message Update For Media + Korean Adoptees,
September 10th, 2024
:

Since we are getting contacted by media in the wake of the recent TRC report, we wanted to update our post with this new preface. The intention of “Something Rotten In Denmark”, written earlier in 2024, is NOT to discredit the work of KoRoot as it was run PRIOR to DKRG’s recent involvement. KoRoot, PRIOR to the involvement of DKRG “leaders” Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han, long served the needs of the Korean Adoptee community in Korea and around the world with enormous compassion and care. We cannot overstate how much respect and gratitude which we have for Pastor Kim, founder of KoRoot, whom in our mind is the embodiment of an angel.

However, Pastor Kim will soon retire, and we are
VERY uncertain about his chosen DKRG replacements, especially as they position themselves publicly in their capacity as the NEW leaders of KoRoot, calling it the “Adoptees' Embassy in Korea”.
(*stifles incredulous laugh*)

The purpose of this page is encourage DKRG “Leaders” (who now lead KoRoot) TO BEHAVE FAR
BETTER TOWARDS ADOPTEES THAN THEY HAVE IN THE PAST. Peter Møller could start by ADMITTING that he is NOT a lawyer. It is apparently ILLEGAL in Denmark to say that you are a lawyer when you are NOT. He could also explain why there are at least 6 articles in the respected Danish publication “Politiken” - not to mention other articles in other publications (all articles *which we could find are linked below) - about his past mismanagement of the START! and Vesterbro Music Festivals and his abusive treatment of bands. His wife Boonyoung Han could start by explaining to me WHY she participated in blocking me from ALL DKRG / TRC related forums for NO REASON having had NO ARGUMENT, after hoovering up my years of research about Switching through her KICA study and then going forward to international press about this very topic, once I had been blocked from the DKRG / TRC movement and permanently ghosted. Both Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han might explain why they ACTIVELY PREVENTED me from meeting with the TRC investigators after I had already PAID for a trip to Korea specifically to do so, and why to date they have NEVER ONCE mentioned Paperslip in ANY of their COPIOUS international press opportunities - despite the fact that Paperslip is still the ONLY website specifically by and for KSS (Korea Social Service) Adoptees. Bear in mind that DKRG - the Danish Korean Rights Group - was specifically set up to focus on the adoption corruption within two of the four major Korean Adoption Agencies - Holt and KSS - as these are the only two Korean Agencies which sent children for adoption to Denmark. The creation of Paperslip in 2020 by this KSS Adoptee preceded the creation of DKRG, and DKRG “leaders” are WELL aware of this website. They just never mention it in the press. Because despite Paperslip’s CONSTANT focus on trying to help KSS Adoptees, DKRG’s mentioning of Paperslip would take away their shine.

Most egregiously, both Peter Møller (a HOLT Adoptee) and especially Boonyoung Han (a KSS Adoptee) were WELL aware of my years’ long KSS
K-Number research, which was based on my VERY personal and VERY deeply falsified adoption case, for which I had hoped to get answers through the TRC investigation - yet Peter Møller deliberately assigned FALSE credit for my research to DKRG supporter Bastiaan Flikweert on a DKRG / TRC forum from which I had been blocked. It took over ONE year for Bastiaan Flikweert to FINALLY ADMIT he had NO role in my original research.

Sadly, Korean Adoptees in relationship to Korean Adoption Agencies are literal and figurative beggars - and unfortunately, beggars cannot be choosers. This puts Korean Adoptees around the world in a VERY vulnerable position, so when we came to see the extent to which Korean Adoptees were being mistreated by DKRG Leadership in the lead-up to the TRC Investigation, naturally we were incensed. Our own mistreatment by DKRG “leaders” - we received three out-of-nowhere and devastating figurative punches by DKRG, resulting in our agonizing decision to WITHDRAW our OWN TRC CASE from the investigation in 2023 - is described in detail below.

We wish to express that while DKRG leaders Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han have behaved in SERIOUSLY EGREGIOUS ways toward not only this writer but also toward other Korean Adoptees with active TRC (Truth and Reconciliation) cases (still without explanation or apology), we also recognize the work that is being done to serve a general cause which so many Korean Adoptees believe in. (Though in truth we are in doubt about the motivations of some within DKRG leadership). Ultimately, we at Paperslip share the same overall goals which DKRG “leaders” purport to hold: We want better file access for Korean Adoptees;
better transparency in the birth family search process for Adoptees; better treatment of Korean Adoptees by Korean Adoption Agencies, Western Partner Adoption Agencies, and the Korean Government; adequate funding, staffing, and space to be provided by the Korean Government to NCRC for the PROPER management of Korean Adoption files; and a reckoning with and atoning for the egregious past associated with many aspects of Korean Adoption by the Korean Adoption Agencies, Korean Government, and Western Partner Adoption Agencies.

We at Paperslip DO NOT have any financial motive in our advocacy for KSS Adoptees. We just want to see conditions improve for KSS Adoptees and for Korean Adoptees overall. We ardently wish that we did not have to waste time and energy fighting people who are SUPPOSED to be on the
SAME side.

As regards Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han of DKRG / KoRoot:
Call us crazy, but we just believe that if you are going to present yourself as “defenders” of “TRUTH” and “JUSTICE”, then you should TELL THE
TRUTH and ACT JUSTLY.

+

Partial Timeline of Events:

2018: We begin research into the topic of Switching. We invited “fellow” KSS Adoptee Boonyoung Han as a “supporter” to a private forum of Switched Adoptees from around the world. (Boonyoung Han is not to our knowledge switched). She promised in writing that she would not discuss our findings outside of the forum, and she never contributed any posts or insights. She would later go on to hoover up our research through the KICA (Korea Intercountry Adoption) study - to which we had referred all the switched Adoptees WE had found and whose stories we had organized - then block us from ALL DKRG / TRC related forums and completely ghost us before going to international press about Switching. Of course, Paperslip’s original research into Switching was
NEVER acknowledged, despite the fact that neither Boonyoung Han nor Peter Møller have switch cases themselves. Despite Boonyoung Han and Peter Møller being Danish, it was US who connected DKRG to all of the Danish switched Adoptees who eventually submitted their cases to the TRC.

2020: We begin research into KSS K-Numbers. This research is directly related to our VERY personal adoption cases. Boonyoung Han would eventually contribute her
own K-Number to our research. She was well aware that we were conducting this research since 2020.

2020: We created Paperslip.org, which was from 2020-2021 a password protected site.

2021: We made Paperslip.org a public site.

February 2022: We confidentially shared information about our original KSS K-Number research with Bastiaan Flikweert, the non-Adoptee son of two KSS Adoptees who themselves acknowledge that they had directly witnessed my K-Number research on a private forum for KSS Adoptees. At the time, DKRG had not even formed yet (to our knowledge). Bastiaan Flikweert promised not to share this information with others. At the time, our research was only shared to Paperslip, which was at the time a password protected site shared only with KSS Adoptees. He would later come share this information with Peter Møller (whom we did not know at the time) without our permission or knowledge. Peter Møller would come to later deliberately attribute FALSE credit to Bastiaan Flikweert for our K-number research on a forum from which we were blocked.

Spring 2022: DKRG (Danish Korean Rights Group) was formed in Denmark. *Note that DKRG was formed 4 years AFTER we began our research into switching, and 2 years AFTER we started Paperslip. Unbeknownst to us, non-Adoptee Bastiaan Flikweert would become a major supporter of DKRG.

June 24, 2022 - I was recruited to participate by an associate of Boonyoung Han’s in the KICA (Korea Intercountry Adoption) Study around June 2022. I knew that Boonyoung Han was one of the researchers of this study, but was not aware of DKRG or Peter Møller at this time, nor that he had anything to do with the study. Since Boonyoung Han had been part of a forum for Switched Adoptees which I had invited her to join as a “supporter” in 2020, I am sure that this was the reason why I was invited to join this study - so that Boonyoung Han and her research team could collect the information I had gathered about Switching since 2018. I agreed to participate in the study and referred many Switched Adoptees I know to participate in this study. I even did an interview with a researcher based in Jeju, Korea via Zoom on July 15th, 2022 for the study. After hoovering up my personal adoption documents and information about my switch case through this study starting in June 2022, Boonyoung Han and Peter Moller would come to BLOCK me from ALL DKRG / TRC forums by December 4th, 2022 - just a few MONTHS later.

August 2022: Peter Møller, who at the time may have been dating Boonyoung Han (they are now married) reaches out to us to help spread the word to Korean Adoptees about how to submit cases to the TRC, which we gladly agree to do. We create a video explaining how to fill out the TRC application forms, and post the video widely to Korean Adoptee forums.

September 11th, 2022: We submit our case to the TRC. It becomes one of the first 34 cases accepted to the TRC.

December 2022: For no reason, Boonyoung Han and Peter Møller BLOCK us from ALL DKRG / TRC related Facebook forums. They have NEVER responded to our MANY attempts at communication to find out WHY we were excluded without explanation, reason, or apology.

January 1st, 2023: DKRG’s Peter Møller gives deliberately false credit to Bastiaan Flikweert for our original KSS K-Number research on a DKRG / TRC forum from which we are BLOCKED. Multiple Danish Adoptees reported this to us immediately, since they all were well aware that we had done the work. In assigning false credit to Bastiaan Flikweert on a DKRG / TRC forum, Peter Møller OUTS our previously private research to non-KSS Adoptees and non-Korean Adoptees (and who knows who else) who are part of the forum. We are not able to defend our work due to being blocked, and Bastiaan Flikweert patently refuses to acknowledge that he had no role in our research, even privately. In not coming forward to set the record straight for over one YEAR, he patently accepts the false credit given to him for our original research. Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han moderate the DKRG / TRC forums, and along with Bastiaan Flikweert were ALL aware that I was blocked from their forums and could not defend myself.

February 2023: Despite our mistreatment by DKRG, we book a trip to Korea to meet with the TRC. The TRC agrees to meet with us, but unexpectedly CC’s DKRG’s Peter Møller, Boonyoung Han, and Peter Knudsen on their email response to us confirming our appointment. One day later, Peter Møller posts to DKRG / TRC forums from which we are blocked that Adoptees should not try to be “first in line” to meet with the TRC. Shortly after that, the TRC CANCELS their appointment with us. We thus are forced to cancel our trip to Korea, losing a significant amount of money in the process. We realize that DKRG has deliberately run interference in our planned TRC appointment. We had been under the impression that once our case was submitted to the TRC, that DKRG would have no further involvement - it’s still a mystery to us as to why the TRC investigators CC’d DKRG on their email response to us, originally confirming our appointment in Korea.

March 2023: We make the excruciating decision to withdraw our case from the TRC, having taken 3 hard PUNCHES from DKRG for
NO reason.

Spring 2023: DKRG goes forward to the press about Switching. Of course, NONE of our original research into Switching is mentioned. DKRG has NEVER mentioned Paperslip in the press, despite their MANY media appearances, and despite their being WELL aware of our work.

February 17th, 2024: Bastiaan Fliweert FINALLY admits on a private Korean Adoption forum that he had
NO role in our original KSS K-Number research. However, the only reason he admits this is due to pressure we were able to put on him on a shared Adoption forum from which we were NOT blocked by DKRG (since they do not moderate the forum). He does not apologize, however, for not coming forward to make this admission for over ONE YEAR.

2024: DKRG continues to pretend as though Paperslip does not exist in the media - despite the fact that DKRG was specifically set up to address adoption corruption by the Korean Adoption Agencies Holt and KSS (Korea Social Service) - and despite the fact that Paperslip is the FIRST and ONLY site created by and for KSS Adoptees.

September 2024: In his role as Administrator of the KoRoot Facebook group, Peter Møller turns on post approval so as to prevent us from posting information which will help KSS Adoptees. This is the first time in the 17.5 years that KoRoot’s Facebook history that they have turned on post approval for posts.

+

‘Funny’ How DKRG NEVER mentions Paperslip’s discovery of KSS’ formerly secret “Korean Adoptive Child Study Summary” in this recent A+J piece about a KSS Adoptee. But then, DKRG NEVER mentions Paperslip in their MANY press opportunities at ALL

Kind of weird when DKRG is supposedly all about exposing adoption corruption at Holt and
KSS, yet NEVER mentions Paperslip, the FIRST and ONLY website by and for KSS Adoptees…

Update - September 12th, 2024: We stumbled upon an otherwise moving and well crafted video by A+J called “South Korea’s Abandoned Biracial Babies” which features a very kind and sympathetic fellow KSS Adoptee whom we personally know, who was adopted to the Netherlands. We do not have any issue with this KSS Adoptee, and our complaint below is not at all about the main KSS Adoptee featured in this piece.

However we couldn’t help but notice this portion of the video at about the 6:00 mark, which we have screencaptured above, where the A+J narrator states, quote:

“The Danish Korean Rights Group found that in many cases names, birth dates and parent names were marked as “unknown”, even when the agencies had that information.”

To our utter lack of surprise, DKRG once again OMITS the fact that it was Paperslip which made the important discovery of KSS’ formerly secret “
KOREAN Adoptive Child Study Summary”, the document which sometimes contains birth parent information about a KSS Adoptee even if their “ENGLISH Adoptive Child Study Summary” says that they were “abandoned” and found with a “paper-slip” or “memo” in their “clothings” (sic). DKRG’s research into KSS documents came well after ours, yet it’s likely that DKRG led this A+J reporter to believe that DKRG alone has done research into falsified KSS documents - which is, dare we say - entirely false.

While Korean Adoptees in general have LONG known that Korean Adoption Agencies withhold information from them and likely have secret documents / archives which Adoptees are never permitted to see, the recent intense focus on the KSS specific document which we call the “ENGLISH Adoptive Child Study Summary” in media pieces in which DKRG “leaders” are featured is occurring precisely because of Paperslip’s very public discovery of the formerly secret KSS specific document which
we coined colloquially as the “KOREAN Adoptive Child Study Summary”. Our VERY public exposure of the often profound differences between the ENGLISH and KOREAN Adoptive Child Study Summaries (which we have made overt on this website since its creation in 2020) have been well known to DKRG since their formation, yet remain wholly unacknowledged in ALL of the copious media opportunities which they have garnered for themselves. They simply cannot stand to share the spotlight, so they either pretend that Paperslip’s discoveries don’t exist, or they attempt to take credit for them (as is subtly evident here). This is certainly not the first media piece in which DKRG fails to mention our work. In fact, they NEVER have.

That the locus of KSS document falsification has become the “ENGLISH Adoptive Child Study Summary” traces back to when we discovered our own “KOREAN Adoptive Child Study Summary” in the back of our KSS adoption file in 2018 - not being able to read Korean or Hanja, we did not know at the time what the title of the document meant, nor what the significance of the document was. In 2021 we figured out how to request and obtain this document from KSS, and began to deploy other KSS Adoptees to request it. Everyone whom we have since counseled about this process has been able to request and obtain their formerly secret “KOREAN Adoptive Child Study Summary” - a name which
WE coined, as the Hanja title of the document does NOT directly translate to this colloquial (common use) name.

We are sure that DKRG would have been quite happy to let the A+J reporter believe that DKRG had discovered KSS’ formerly SECRET
KOREAN Adoptive Child Study Summary” - discussion of which is more or less the FUNDAMENTAL BASIS of this ENTIRE website. We chose to name this website “Paperslip” in 2020 when we first created it, precisely because this term was probably used in thousands of KSS Adoptees’ orphanizedEnglish Adoptive Child Study Summary” documents. These routinely falsified documents were provided to prospective adoptive parents along with a photograph of the child in the process of “matching” a Korean “orphan” to adoptive families. The name “Paperslip” is EMBLEMATIC of the mass scale orphanization of KSS Adoptees during the time of KSS’ operation of its adoption business, from 1964-2012. We began to look at and compare KSS Adoptees’ often (though not always) falsified “English Adoptive Child Study Summary” documents in the course of our original KSS K-number research which we conducted from 2020-present, for which DKRG also egregiously tried to pilfer credit on January 1st, 2023, by giving false credit to one of their supporters on a DKRG forum from which we had been blocked.

The documents featured in the A+J video, shown in the screenshots above, are what we now call the “
ENGLISH Adoptive Child Study Summary”. This document does not actually ever have the word “ENGLISH” in its title (it’s just called the “Adoptive Child Study Summary” at the top of the physical document, though this may vary by Western receiving country), but we have coined and used this term since discovering the Korean version, in order to distinguish it from the formerly secret “KOREAN Adoptive Child Study Summary”. The actual Hanja title at the top of the document does not directly translate to “KOREAN Adoptive Child Study Summary”, but we realized in 2021 that this is how KSS referred to this document. No one at KSS told us that we could request this document by its colloquial name - we just figured it out.

No one in the world of KSS Adoptees was talking about these documents nor the difference between them before we happened upon a “Korean Adoptive Child Study Summary” in 2018, and then realized in 2021 (through dialogue with a fellow KSS Adoptee who does not wish to be named) that KSS Adoptees could regularly request and obtain this document from KSS. We have been regularly deploying KSS Adoptees to request this formerly secret document since 2021, and every KSS Adoptee whom we know who has
properly requested the document has been able to obtain it ever since.

You only have to read the
home page of Paperslip to know what this site is about, and to see how much our discussion of the sometimes striking DIFFERENCES between the information contained within a KSS Adoptee’s English and Korean Adoptive Child Study Summaries permeates this site and our mission.

All of this to say that - when we were first blocked by DKRG “leaders” out of the DKRG / TRC movement in 2022, shortly after being approached by DKRG to HELP them, which we gladly did - it really took us a
LONG time to understand WHY. Because believe it or not, we did not think that we would get backstabbed by fellow Korean Adoptees - one of whom (Boonyoung Han) is also a KSS Adoptee who had observed and even participated in our research and who knew about the deep falsification in our case/s for YEARS - in order to take credit for our work.

Since we were naive, we did not realize until MUCH later - when DKRG “leader” Peter Møller deliberately gave FALSE credit to DKRG supporter Bastiaan Flikweert for our original
KSS K-Number research - that the likely reason why DKRG “leaders” Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han had blocked us out of the movement was precisely in order to take false credit for the work that we had done since 2018 in researching the history and practice of KSS - specifically with regards to Switching, KSS K-Numbers, and, as evidenced above, the discovery of the formerly secret “KOREAN Adoptive Child Study Summary”.

The example above from the A+J video is just further evidence that we were blocked from the DKRG / TRC movement in order for DKRG to take public credit for some of our most important work. Which is so
PATHETIC given that we would gladly have CONTRIBUTED our work freely had we only been given proper credit where proper credit is DUE.

Sometimes, when something stinks - it’s just because it’s ROTTEN.

Peter Møller LIES About Being A “Lawyer”
+
6 Danish “Politiken” Articles (+ Other Articles) Regarding His Financial Mismanagement of the Danish START! and Vesterbo Festivals + Abusive Behavior Towards Bands.

Guess who is still NOT a lawyer? Peter Møllerhas been telling the WORLD that he is a lawyer / attorney since 2022 when he first came onto international radar, but he was NOT a lawyer back then and he is NOT a lawyer now - at least, not according to Denmark’s directory of ALL laywers: Advokat Samfundet. Try the search yourself for both “Peter Møller” and “Peter Regel Møller”. There are many Danish people named “Peter Møller”, but you’re not going to find the right one on this site.

As of Sunday, September 15th, 2024, DKRG’s / KoRoot’s Peter Møller is still
NOT a lawyer, according to Denmark’s directory of ALL Danish Lawyers: Advokat Samfundet.We notice that NO news publications call Peter Møllera lawyer anymore. Yet we know that as of at least August 2024, Peter Møller has told at least one person that he is a “lawyer” - when he is apparently still NOT.

Written in Spring 2024:

Before I get into the specifics of my personal issues with DKRG (Danish Korean Rights Group) “leaders” Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han, I think it’s important to say that my concern about them goes beyond myself, and extends to the Korean Adoptee community at large.

Having now been witness to the behind the scenes behavior of DKRG leaders Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han since 2022, I want to note that they not only USE / ABUSE / and LOSE countless Korean Adoptees, but they have absolutely ZERO remorse for any of their egregious behavior.

Peter Møller in particular is a danger to the Korean Adoptee community, because he has been inexplicably chosen by Pastor Kim (whom we greatly admire, but with whom we seriously disagree over this naive and likely dangerous decision) to co-lead the Korean NGO KoRoot, influenced greatly by his (now) wife Boonyoung Han. Once Pastor Kim fully retires, Peter Møller will likely (as of now) be in charge of KoRoot.

We cannot think of someone we believe to be more antithetical to the kind way in which Pastor Kim has treated Korean Adoptees over the years than Peter Møller. We greatly respect the KoRoot of the past under Pastor Kim, but we are SERIOUSLY worried about the potential KoRoot of the future, given Peter Møller’s pattern of egregious behavior with his past Music Festival businesses and with Korean Adoptees with active TRC cases who are part of the DKRG / TRC forums which he and his wife Boonyoung Han moderate with a severely disciplinary - and sometimes verbally abusive - hand. Several Korean Adoptees have described DKRG as “cult-like” and note that almost everyone is AFRAID to speak up (both on DKRG forums and outside of them) for FEAR of reprisals from Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han. This kind of atmosphere of FEAR created by DKRG “leadership” is just INTOLERABLE, and we do not think that this kind of behavior by Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han toward Korean Adoptees over whom they hold any kind of power - whether real or imaginary - is likely to change.

We know that before he became involved with DKRG and the Korean Adoptee community, Peter Møller developed a REALLY bad reputation in the music industry in Denmark related to the music festivals START! and Vesterbro Festival - Peter Møller’s mismanagement and poor treatment of bands was widely reported about in multiple articles by the serious Danish publication Politiken (see article links below). Peter moved from Denmark to Korea in 2023, seemingly leaving his festival businesses behind. There are apparently SEVERAL negative articles (see below) in Danish press related to this topic. For one example, you can view the article below if you turn off your adblocker:

https://gaffa.dk/nyheder/2013/maj/vesterbro-festival-under-massiv-kritik/?fbclid=IwAR0mkR7isoGA0RwKVFXdw45aB6ybOojaTTMFb-61xUhCpa7vhp2kifbVzvI

”The festival is criticized from several sides for a lack of transparency and poor treatment of bands

BY LINE HOLM CHRISTENSEN / PHOTO: MICHAEL JENSEN / 07.05.2013

This coming weekend, the Vesterbro Festival takes place in Den Brune Kødby in Copenhagen. Around 80 bands will play at this year's festival, which is now facing great criticism from several quarters.

The Public Information Committee under the Culture and Leisure Administration in Copenhagen has thus initiated an investigation of the Vesterbro Festival, and also of the practice venue association MUVE, which is closely connected to the festival. This happens after accusations that the association has excluded several critical members and that there is no transparency in the board and in the festival. This is written by politiken.dk.

Jesper Nordahl, deputy chairman of the Copenhagen Municipality's Music Committee and one chairman of Dansk Live, also directs criticism at the Vesterbro festival. He says to politiken.dk:

"We have warned young musicians many times against playing at the Vesterbo Festival. But there are so many very young, brand new bands who want to perform, and you can understand that they want to. But because they are very young and perhaps a little naive, they don't listen to the stories that there is incompetence in the festival's management, that there is bad behavior towards bands and volunteers and lack of transparency in the accounts of the festival and the rehearsal space association".

The festival's chairman and ordinary board member of MUVE, Peter Møller, rejects the criticism and welcomes the municipality's investigation:

"They should be welcome to that. We are happy to put everything forward. We are positive about the investigation, and we are sure that we live up to the rules and our own statutes that are in the association. There is nothing to look forward to ", says Peter Møller to politiken.dk.”

+

https://gaffa.dk/nyheder/2013/august/vesterbro-festival-omstrukturerer-internt-efter-kritik/ 

“Vesterbro Festival restructures internally after criticism

After a forced extraordinary general meeting, two key people have been given less prominent roles

BY SIDSEL THOMASSEN

23.08.2013

“Vesterbro Festival has been in the spotlight for large parts of 2013, and it has not only been because of the programme. The small niche festival has been the subject of sharp criticism and has been accused of having opaque accounts and of being too closely associated with the Music Association Vesterbro (MUVE).

The duo (redacted) and Peter Møller have been criticized for having one foot in each camp. Both of them have had financial and managerial responsibility in the two associations that stand behind Vesterbro Festival – the association Vesterbro Festival and the rehearsal room association MUVE, which is why, according to the critics, there has been disqualification and payment of operating support across the associations.

Since May this year, both culture and leisure mayor Pia Allerslev and Rikke Lauritzen, chairman of the Folkeoplysningsudvalget, have demanded action from the management of the two close-knit associations and have even threatened to remove the annual municipal contribution of DKK 100,000 that MUVE receives in direct support. Now the associations have taken the consequences of the criticism and have held the general meeting that has been forced upon them, so that things can be put in order.

According to Politiken, after a good two-hour long meeting on Tuesday, it resulted in the 29 voting members of MUVE having elected a completely new board and at the same time also a new chairman. That title is now awarded to Claus Bøje. This does not mean, however, that (redacted) and Peter Møller are completely out of the game. The former chairman (redacted) will now act as day-to-day manager of MUVE, and Peter Møller will hold the position of chairman of the association Vesterbro Festival as before.”

+

https://www.kk.dk/dagsordener-og-referater/Folkeoplysningsudvalget/m%C3%B8de-04062013/referat/punkt-11

”Problem statement

On the basis of several inquiries about, among other things, the refusal to admit new members, the exclusion of members, financial disputes, competence and the use of municipal grants, the Culture and Leisure Administration has carried out special supervision of MUVE since 2011. The supervision has taken place against the background of the provisions of the Norwegian Public Information Act association approvals, including supervision of the association's compliance with its own statutes as well as supervision of the management of public grants.”

+

There are additionally these articles in the Danish publication “POLITIKEN” about the same topic:

https://politiken.dk/kultur/musik/art5465270/Kritiseret-duo-bag-Vesterbro-Festival-ude-af-bestyrelsen

https://politiken.dk/kultur/musik/art5465274/Kasserer-m%C3%A5tte-s%C3%B8ge-aktindsigt-i-egne-regnskaber

https://politiken.dk/kultur/musik/art5465271/Festival-kan-ikke-betale-sine-regninger-men-h%C3%A6ver-bossens-l%C3%B8n

https://politiken.dk/kultur/musik/art5443640/Advarsel-til-bands-Spil-ikke-p%C3%A5-Start-Festival

  • https://politiken.dk/kultur/musik/art5465273/Borgmester-truer-med-at-tr%C3%A6kke-st%C3%B8tten-til-stor-festival

    See the screencapture below which shows that the Peter Møller discussed in these articles about the mismanagement of Danish Music Festivals is the SAME Peter Møller of DKRG.

    +

    Peter Møller has brought his own brand of shady and poor - not to mention VERBALLY ABUSIVE - management to the Korean Adoptee community in his role as head of DKRG. We will not post screenshots here without the permission of multiple Korean Adoptees whom DKRG “leaders” Peter Møller, Boonyoung Han, and others have verbally abused on their closed, private forums. Yet publicly, Peter Møller presents himself as an angel with only “concern” for the Korean Adoptee community, signing all of his missives with “Love, Peter”. It’s classic abuse behavior to punch below the neck, so that the bruises do not show. So it is with how DKRG leaders Peter Møller, Boonyoung Han, and others verbally abuse Korean Adoptees with active TRC cases on their closed, private forums, yet publicly present themselves as “defenders” of Korean Adoptees Rights. I know countless Korean Adoptees with active TRC cases whom Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han have blocked from their DKRG forums for no reason. This is definitely NOT the behavior of those who REALLY care about Korean Adoptee Rights.

    And don’t just take my word for how Peter Møller behaves - check out the UNCANNILY SIMILAR issues which Danish TV2’s documentary team had with Peter Møller at the bottom of the page. There’s a clear PATTERN of behavior here which myself and many Danish Korean Adoptees see as extremely DANGEROUS for the Korean Adoptee community.

    Without any remorse, Peter Møller has told MANY LIES to Korean Adoptees, including the worst lie of all: that he is a “lawyer”. (See graphics at the end of this section). Peter presented himself to me as a “lawyer” in August 2022 when he first approached me to help DKRG spread the word to US Korean Adoptees about how to submit their forms to the TRC (Truth and Reconciliation Commission). In countless news articles in which he appeared, he has presented himself as a “lawyer”. However, according to MANY reliable Danish sources, Peter is NOT a lawyer, and it is actually ILLEGAL in Denmark to say that you are a lawyer when you are NOT one. He is apparently not listed on the
    Advokat Samfundet website where all Danish lawyers are listed. Peter Regel Møller is apparently only something like a PARALEGAL, and NOT a LAWYER (as of 2022, 2023, 2024).

    I personally signed over legal representation to Peter when I first submitted my case to the TRC by their deadline of September 11th, 2022. As part of that process, I submitted my private, sensitive adoption documents to the TRC by way of DKRG’s submission process. By December 4th, 2022 - just months later - Peter Møller and Boonyoung had for NO LEGITIMATE REASON BLOCKED me from ALL DKRG / TRC forums and have effectively GHOSTED me from that point forward to the present. It was after doing this that Peter deliberately and knowingly gave false credit for my research into KSS K-Numbers to his loyal footsoldier, Bastiaan Flikweert, the Dutch son of 2 KSS Adoptees who had themselves admittedly been witness to my research since 2020.

    For her part, Boonyoung Han had been aware since at least 2020 that I was researching KSS K-Numbers (as she had contributed her OWN KSS K-Number to my research) and had also been aware of my research into Switching since 2020. She would have known that my research into both KSS K-Numbers and Switching came from a VERY personal place, as it grew directly out of my own adoption case and related cases. So for Boonyoung to have deliberately BLOCKED me from ALL DKRG / TRC forums before going forward to the press about Switching - because she apparently wanted the CREDIT and the SPOTLIGHT - is extremely SICK.

    It should also be understood that this is not just about my being butt-hurt about being blocked from some random Facebook forums. This is about being DELIBERATELY SHUT OUT OF A MOVEMENT in which I had invested an extreme amount of HOPE for getting ANSWERS about my extremely twisted Korean adoption case. That hope effectively DIED because Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han could not stomach the thought of anyone else getting the spotlight. The two of them have effectively prevented me from ever getting answers about my case and my twin’s case through the TRC. That is not only extremely DARK - it’s INSANE.

    I go into more specifics about all of this below, but I think it is important to understand the standard Modus Operandi, the ambition, and the sheer ruthlessness of Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han. They are quite the pair, and many Danish Korean Adoptees whom have also been treated egregiously by Peter and Boonyoung say that it is really Boonyoung who is the "Puppet Master” controlling Peter.

    Whoever is in charge of this behind-the-scenes sh*t show, it is one thing for Peter and Boonyoung to regularly BLOCK Danish Korean Adoptees with ACTIVE TRC CASES from their private DKRG / TRC forums. To understand why this would matter, it helps to know that the DKRG is the mouthpiece for the TRC investigation in Korea. The only way for Korean Adoptees with active TRC cases to get regular information about the ongoing investigation is through DKRG. So when DKRG shuts a Korean Adoptee with an active TRC case out of their private forums, it means that that Korean Adoptee is totally IN THE DARK about what is happening with the ongoing TRC investigation. For many Korean Adoptees with active TRC cases - including myself, before I WITHDREW my TRC case in March 2023, due to Peter and Boonyoung’s egregious behavior, which I describe in more detail in the section below - being blocked from the ONLY source of information regarding their TRC case has caused a serious amount of anxiety and harm.

    Danish Adoptees are collectively TOO AFRAID to come forward to speak about Peter and Boonyoung’s abusive treatment of them, which many have likened to “dictatorial” and “North Korea - like”.

    Let’s put this plainly: Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han are two people who claim to be a “Korean Adoptee Rights Group” - yet they routinely BLOCK Korean Adoptees with active TRC cases from DKRG forums which are the only way for such Korean Adoptees to get information about the progress of the investigation. It’s hard to overstate the importance the TRC investigation might have for an emotionally vulnerable Korean Adoptee who has placed hope in the TRC investigation about their adoption case. Let’s not forget that Adoptees in general have a much higher suicide rate than the non-Adoptee population. I don’t think Peter Møller or Boonyoung Han at all think about the consequences of their actions as they supposedly “fight for Korean Adoptees’ rights” - I think they are too high on their own “power” to really care about whom their actions affect or the extent of the damage that they are causing by routinely blocking and ghosting countless Korean Adoptees who have submitted their cases to the TRC.

    It is one thing for Danish Korean Adoptees who know EXACTLY how Peter and Boonyoung egregiously behave, and to remain in complicit SILENCE because they are too afraid to be kicked off of or BLOCKED from DKRG / TRC forums while they still have active TRC cases. It will be another thing, however, once the TRC investigation is OVER in one year, and Peter and Boonyoung begin to try to work with the broader Korean Adoptee community outside of just the small, cloistered world of Danish Korean Adoptees with active TRC cases. Word spreads like WILDFIRE in the GLOBAL Korean Adoptee community, and without the TRC investigation to hold people hostage to their dictatorial rule, Peter and Boonyoung may actually need to TREAT PEOPLE LIKE HUMAN BEINGS in order to retain ANY kind of respect in the broader Korean Adoption community.

    I think it’s important to say that while I have had my FAIR SHARE of abuse and mistreatment from DKRG’s Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han, I do not think that the Korean Adoptee community at large really knows WHOM they are up against when dealing with this pair of damaged and damaging people. Good friends of mine have shared some horrible lies that DKRG “leadership” has spread about them, after blocking them too from DKRG / TRC forums for no reason except to exclude ANYONE who might take away their shine. I think it is my duty to warn the Korean Adoptee community as these two are capable of inflicting a LOT of irreparable damage.

    Below the graphic is a more in-depth description of the sordid experience I had with DKRG’s Peter Møller, Boonyoung Han, and Bastiaan Flikweert.


Peter Møller is NOT a lawyer.

I think you have to ask yourself why someone who could so easily have his LIES be discovered STILL decide to LIE?

Though Peter Møller is NOT a lawyer, he presents himself as one. For example, on this September 15th, 2022 post to the “DKRG International” forum - a forum which DKRG later angrily shut down completely for bizarro reasons. Writing about himself, Peter Møller writes: “Peter Møller trained as a lawyer…” Notice the wording is a bit slick as he says he “trained as a lawyer” without actually saying that his IS one. Verbally, Peter Møller always told me that he was a lawyer, which I unfortunately did not question at the time. But he is definitely NOT one.

Notably, Peter Møller says nothing about his prior years of experience working with Vesterbro Festival. We wonder why…

Above: Screenshot of one of the MANY articles in which Peter Møller uses the title of “attorney” or “lawyer”. He is neither an attorney nor a lawyer. His name CANNOT be found on a search of Denmark’s Advokat Samfundet website (which lists ALL of Denmark’s actual lawyers and attorneys) below:

Try this search on Denmark’s Advokat Samfundet site yourself to see if YOU can locate “Peter Regel Møller” on this website which lists all Danish lawyers. (Please note there are MANY people with the name “Peter Møller”, but DKRG’s Peter Regel Møller is not listed on this site, because he is - surprise - NOT a lawyer.

Peter Møller has been in Danish press since at least 2011 for financial mismanagement of the START! Festival and Vesterbro Festival - and other bad behavior related to these Danish Music Festivals.

Peter Møller has been in Danish press for wrongdoing connected to his role in the mismanagement of Music Festivals since at least 2011. He was intensively in Danish press for financial mismanagement and bad behavior in connection to the Vesterbro Festival in 2013 (see articles linked above). We do not know if there were any prior or subsequent Danish press articles about Peter Møller.

Link:
https://gaffa.dk/artikler/2011/juni/den-gale-pen-moder-peter-moller-start-festival/

”The Copenhagen upcoming festival has been heavily criticized for messing up the accounts. We are looking for an explanation.

BY CHRISTIAN BÆKHOLM / 05.06.2011

Start Festival is the place where new bands can test themselves. It has taken place at Vesterbro in Copenhagen for the past nine years, but this year has been severely criticized for having a root in the accounts. Several bookers, artists and other players who have worked with the festival believe, for example…”

There is a pattern of Peter Møller’s behavior which becomes clear through these articles. He has a Modus Operandi of consistently behaving badly, excluding / blocking members of his organizaitons, ceasing communications, and denying financial mismanagement / lying.

Above: https://politiken.dk/kultur/musik/art5465271/Festival-kan-ikke-betale-sine-regninger-men-h%C3%A6ver-bossens-l%C3%B8n 

”Festival can't pay its bills - but raises the boss's salary

Harsh accusations of financial mess rain down on Start! Festival that is underway at Vesterbro.

MUSIC JUNE 17 2011

ANDERS HJORT

100 bands play these days through Start! Festival in Den Brune Kødby on Vesterbro.

But this year's festival, where the growth layer on the Danish music scene has the opportunity to showcase their talents, is disrupted by harsh criticism from the festival's promoters.

"There is an opaque economy and organisation, personal coincidences and personal financial interests. There are creditors who do not get their money and decidedly erroneous reasons for the festival's poor finances,' says Mads Tamborg from the Music Association RUSK. It previously supported the festival financially, but stopped its contribution in 2007.

Last year, the festival's bad accounts resulted in an outstanding debt to creditors of DKK 1,056,755.64. Subsequently, Start! Festival settlement with the creditors, i.a. the booking companies Scandinavian, PDH Music and Live Nation, as well as a number of additional suppliers.

Start! Festival was thereby saved from bankruptcy at the mercy of creditors. Even so, the festival's boss, (name redacted), got a DKK 30,000 increase in salary, an increase of 25 percent.

Criticism from former business partners
The accounts for the companies behind Start! Festival, which ibyen.dk owns, shows that the festival manager's salary has increased from DKK 120,000 to DKK 150,000.

This happened at the same time that all the creditors were paid only 41.4873 percent of the amount they were entitled to. That is, less than half of the money they had in view.

"It's no secret that last year was not a great year for us. That's why there was an incredible amount more work, and the salary was set according to the work effort,' says press manager Peter Møller, speaking on behalf of Start! Festival where the performers play for free.

The financial problems, the critics believe, are to be found in the fact that the festival has less funding than in the past.

»Several factors indicate that Start! Festival's financial figures do not match. And it seems that the festival's collaborators are a lot fewer than the organizers themselves claim", says Mads Tamborg from the Music Association RUSK, who is reaching out for the people behind Start! Festival.

The municipality has stopped the support

The festival's press manager, Peter Møller, defends the festival to ibyen.dk. He says that the support from the partners this year is the biggest, Start! Festival ever had.

The fact is that a list of the festival's sponsors shows that i.a. The training room association RMK, JP Fond and Veko (Vesterbro Kortet) no longer donate money to the festival. According to ibyen.dk's information, AP Møller, who has previously supported the festival, completely closed off the flow of money in 2010.

In addition, the Copenhagen rehearsal space associations have terminated their cooperation with the festival this year.

The Municipality of Copenhagen last year supported Start! Festival with 200,000 kroner. However, in April, after looking at the accounts, Copenhagen Municipality chose to reject the festival's application to receive DKK 300,000.

"We simply assessed that the finances of the festival were too fragile, and that you can better support the growth layer by putting the money elsewhere", says Jesper Nordahl, who is deputy chairman of Copenhagen Municipality's Music Committee.

Lack of support

Start! Festival is, according to the festival itself, based on free labor and was originally known as Vesterbro Festival. 2011 will be the ninth time Start!/Vesterbro Festival has taken place.

The accounts for the companies behind Start! Festival shows that the festival has struggled mightily to get the economy running in both 2009 and 2010.

The lack of support from partners means that sponsorship income and fundraising support in 2010 was DKK 240,000 below what the festival had budgeted for.

This has resulted in companies that have agreed a price with the festival for a product that the festival has received. But then later they had to admit that they could not get the agreed payment.

External causes are blamed

Which ended up with a settlement where the creditors only got about DKK 400,000 out of the amount of over DKK one million to which they were entitled.

"This has had a major impact on the suppliers and several players in the music industry. At the same time, the organizers in the press only blame external causes for the losses. In this connection, they justify i.a. the deficit in 2010 with lower income from admission and bar sales due to bad weather. However, their own accounts show that this does not fit", says Mads Tamborg.

He refers to the fact that last year - through ticket and bar sales at Start! Festival - received a total of DKK 10,000 more than budgeted on that account, but that the festival nevertheless used the low audience numbers and the weather as an explanation for the deficit.

Press manager Peter Møller from Start! The festival defends itself with the fact that "all the festival's business partners, creditors and suppliers are also involved this year".

"Last year we were hit by rain, thunderstorms and hail. And if people think that what we are doing is not right, they should have run away screaming. The conditions have not deterred a single one from participating this year,' says Peter Møller.

The festival's biggest sponsor is the festival itself.

Mads Tamborg from the Musikforeningen RUSK also attacks that the organization behind Start! Festival "is very little transparent".

It is the same two people, (name redacted) and press man Peter Møller, who have the financial and management responsibility for two of the parties behind the festival, the rehearsal room association MUVE and the Vesterbro Festival Association.

At the same time, Peter Møller has until this year sat on the board of the production company behind the festival, Ny Dansk Musik Aps, where (name redacted) is director. All three parties are based in Staldgade in Kødbyen.

In 2009, the training local association MUVE donated 360,000 kroner to Start! Festival, while the amount in 2010 was DKK 55,000.

"The festival's biggest partner and grant provider is MUVE. But the festival managers themselves also sit in MUVE, which effectively means that their biggest sponsor is themselves. So they use money from the membership dues in MUVE for the festival", says Mads Tamborg.

Unacceptable conditions

If you want to talk to Start! Festival's production company, it is also (name redacted) who answers the phone.

The two backers, according to the critics, do not say this to the outside world and the press, but instead refer to the fact that different entities are behind the festival.

"When Peter Møller speaks out about these things, it is the equivalent of him looking out the window at a rainstorm and then saying that it is sunny", believes Mads Tamborg, who puts a thick line under the fact that it is not Start! Festival as such, there is a problem.

Press manager Peter Møller from Start! Festival again rejects the criticism.

"I don't see anything odious in the way our structure is set up. If you look at all other festivals in Denmark, they have the same structure. Roskilde Festival, for example, has exactly the same structure as us", says Peter Møller.”

Note the uncannily similar need for me as a Korean Adoptee to WARN other Korean Adoptees about Peter Møller - just as those in the Music industry felt the need to WARN other musicians about participating in the music festivals put on by START and Vesterbro Festival, due directly to Peter Møller’s mismanagement - and just as Danish TV 2’s Producer Nils Bomann felt the need to WARN others about Peter Møller’s bad behavior as well.

Do you see a PATTERN here? Of bad behavior, lying, denial of mismanagement, verbal abuse, opaque financial accounting, and ghosting / ceasing all communications?

We do. Because this message is not just from me. It’s from the growing community of those Korean Adoptees to whom Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han have applied their by now known treatment of: USE / ABUSE / + LOSE.

You can’t say that we didn’t warn you.

Below is the account of my sordid experience with DKRG’s Peter Møller, Boonyoung Han, and Bastiaan Flikweert, from 2022-2024. It would be one thing if I were the only person whom DKRG treated this way. But I think it’s important for the Korean Adoptee community to understand that this is just the standard Modus Operandi of Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han: to USE / LOSE / + ABUSE people.

Something Rotten In Denmark:

DKRG’s Peter Møller Knowingly Falsely Attributed Paperslip’s Original KSS K-Number Research To DKRG Supporter / Member of NLKRG Bastiaan Flikweert on January 1st, 2023. Peter Møller KNEW I Had Done The KSS K-Number Research, Yet LIED And Gave Bastiaan Flikweert FALSE CREDIT On A DKRG Forum From Which I Was BLOCKED.

First I want to say that I do respect some of the work that DKRG has done. Some of the WORK they are doing is absolutely important. But I absolutely DO NOT respect the way in which DKRG “leadership” have steamrolled, lied to, misled, and routinely blocked from DKRG forums MANY Korean Adoptees in their quest for “Adoptee Rights”. Or is it more just a quest for CONTROL and PUBLICITY?

I should note that - unlike DKRG’s behavior - I do NOT hold it against any Korean Adoptee who supports or works with DKRG.

First I should point out that when I submitted my adoption case and SENSITIVE PRIVATE ADOPTION DOCUMENTS through DKRG to the TRC (Truth and Reconciliation Commission) by the TRC’s deadline of September 11th, 2022, I signed over my LEGAL representation to Peter Møller, who had represented himself to me as a “LAWYER”, which he apparently in Denmark is NOT. It is also apparently ILLEGAL in Denmark to represent yourself as a lawyer when you are NOT. Multiple Danish sources who have also been wronged by DKRG have pointed out to me that Peter Møller is NOT listed on the website that names all lawyers in Denmark - that he is only a paralegal - and that he had a failed music festival promotion business in Denmark, before he became active with DKRG. For Peter Møller to have subsequently GHOSTED me - I have not heard from him at ALL in writing since I was BLOCKED from all DKRG / TRC related forums in early December 2022, shortly after submitting my adoption documents and signing over my legal representation to Peter Møller for the TRC case - is frankly FRAUD.

The sad thing about this whole situation is that, back in January 2023, when DKRG’s Peter Møller first knowingly gave false credit to DKRG footsoldier / right hand man Bastiaan Flikweert for my original KSS K-Number research on a DKRG forum from which I had been deliberately BLOCKED, the ONLY thing I asked Bastiaan Flikweert was that Paperslip be credited for the research. This was DENIED, despite Boonyoung Han, Peter Møller, and Bastiaan Flikweert ALL being WELL aware that I had done this original KSS K-Number research. It has taken over one YEAR for the truth to finally come out, and for Bastiaan Flikweert to FINALLY ADMIT he had NO role in my original research into KSS K-Numbers. I would have GLADLY worked TOGETHER with DKRG’s Peter Møller, Boonyoung Han, and Bastiaan Flikweert and openly contributed my original KSS K-Number research to the cause HAD THEY NOT DECIDED TO BLOCK ME FROM THE MOVEMENT IN ORDER TO TAKE CREDIT FOR MY RESEARCH INTO SWITCHING, KSS K-NUMBERS, and KSS HISTORY AND PRACTICE OVERALL.

It is a CRYING shame, because I am definitely NOT in this game for the glory. I want for KSS Adoptees to get as much information as they can so they can learn something about their fractured pasts before they die.

But DKRG has OTHER motivations which are much more narcissistic. I hate that this happened, but all I ever have done, and all I ever WILL do is to tell the TRUTH about what happened to me, in the hopes that DKRG GROWS UP and starts to treat other Korean Adoptees with GREATER RESPECT. Unfortunately, I know that they never will.

It helps to understand a little about my own exhausting and brutal experience with DKRG. On January 1st, 2023, DKRG’s Peter Møller KNOWINGLY LIED and gave FALSE CREDIT for my original KSS K-Number research to one of its staunch supporters / footsoldiers from the NLKRG (Netherlands Korean Rights Group), Bastiaan Flikweert, who has egregiously never refuted this wholly FALSE attribution FINALLY came forward to set the record straight on February 17th, 2024, after more than one YEAR of NOT doing so - and ONLY in response to public pressure.

I had started researching Switching in 2018, and KSS K-Numbers in 2020, in connection to my adoption case. DKRG’s Peter Møller knew about Paperslip and had reached out to me directly in August 2022 to help spread the word about the TRC to US Korean Adoptees, which I gladly helped him to do. My case was one of the first of the 34 cases originally accepted by the TRC, and I was originally excited to be a part of DKRG’s efforts. Something that is little known is that I organized several Switched Korean Adoptees in submitting summaries of their cases to the TRC before DKRG’s TRC effort formed or was known about. Peter Møller himself has acknowledged that the TRC “knew about switching” by the time he met the TRC. The TRC knew about switching at that time because we had already submitted switch case story summaries to the TRC. Boonyoung Han would likely have been aware of this, as she was part of the forum of Switched Adoptees I had invited her to join in 2020 (as a presumably non-switched “supporter” - boy was that a mistake), at the time that I organized switch case summaries to be sent to the TRC. I was shocked when for no reason, while my TRC case was still active, I was unceremoniously BLOCKED later in 2022 from ALL DKRG / TRC related forums by DKRG leader Peter Møller and his (*now) wife Boonyoung Han. In retrospect I now know they treated many Korean Adoptees similarly, but at the time I was completely blindsided. Despite multiple attempts to contact Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han via email, private message, through intermediaries, etc., neither DKRG “leader” has responded to explain why they treated me in the way that they did. I even saw Peter Møller during IKAA in Korea in July 2023, and he could not even look me in the eye - because he knows that he has done me wrong.

Unfortunately in 2023 Peter Møller of DKRG made it a sport on DKRG / *TRC (Truth and Reconciliation) forums from which I had been blocked of falsely crediting Bastiaan Flikweert with my original K-Number research. Multiple people warned me of this and sent screenshots of Peter Møller’s posts, and some Danish KSS Adoptees who had witnessed my research over years of time directly came to my defense. Peter Møller apparently refused to back down, and Bastiaan Flikweert for his part has never publicly corrected this false attribution of my research FINALLY came forward to set the record straight on February 17th, 2024, after more than one YEAR of NOT doing so, and only in response to public pressure. I realize in hindsight that DKRG’s longer term goal in blocking me from all DKRG / TRC forums must have been in order to claim credit for my research into - mainly - Switching; and also KSS K-Numbers. I have been researching Switching since 2018 and KSS K-Numbers since 2020, and in 2020 invited Boonyoun Han to be part of a private online group of Switched Adoptees as a non-switched “supporter”. She agreed at the time not to share information from the group regarding switching with the public, but never consulted me about going forward about Switching to multiple international press outlets in 2023 before she and Peter Møller deliberately and permanently shut me out of the DKRG / TRC movement in 2022. I would have been glad to have supported DKRG before their ruthless and aggressive move to shut me out of the movement.

*Please note that the TRC has nothing directly to do with the DKRG forums related to the TRC. DKRG runs several forums for TRC participants.

Note that DKRG is supposedly about advocating for “Rights” specifically for KSS and Holt Adoptees - and Paperslip is THE ONLY website in the world about KSS and its history for Adoptees. We pioneered researching and making freely and publicly available KSS history and practices beginning in 2021 when Paperslip was created - no one previously had excavated KSS past history and current practices on a public website, for the purpose of educating KSS Adoptees. Yet DKRG has NEVER mentioned Paperslip in the MANY worldwide press articles they have solicited for themselves. Kind of odd, don't you think? This seems less odd when you know a little about DKRG’s cringe inducing behavior toward many Adoptees - myself being just one of them.

Back in 2022 Peter Møller approached me to help him with the DKRG effort, which I gladly did. My case was one of the first 34 accepted for the TRC, but after eagerly helping DKRG in 2022, for no reason, I was blocked from all DKRG / TRC forums and thereafter treated like a punching bag by DKRG. Hindsight is 20/20, and I now realize that DKRG leaders Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han simply wanted to take public credit for my research into Switching, KSS K-Numbers, and KSS history and practice in general. So DKRG deliberately pushed me out, ran interference in a trip to Korea I had paid for in order to talk to the TRC about everything I know about KSS - a trip which I had to cancel after TRC cancelled my previously confirmed appointment following DKRG’s interference. When this happened, after agonizing deliberation and with great disappointment and anger, I withdrew from my case from the TRC. (I wasn’t the only one to withdraw my TRC case due to DKRG’s behavior).

After pushing me out of the DKRG / TRC efforts, on a DKRG forum from which I was BLOCKED, on January 1st, 2023, Peter Møller FALSELY credited Bastiaan Flikweert for Paperslip’s original K-Number research, which we have shared here:

https://www.paperslip.org/kss-knumbers

Unfortunately Bastiaan Flikweert (whom WE have credited on this site for information related to KSS - because WE at least believe in giving credit where credit is due) did NOT set the record straight when Peter Møller falsely gave him credit for my original KSS K-Number research *for over one YEAR - he only did so FINALLY on February 17th, 2024, after more than one year of NOT doing so, and ONLY then in response to public pressure on an Adoptee forum. Bastiaan is the non-Adoptee son of two KSS Adoptees who both privately admit that they know that I was responsible for the KSS K-Number research, as they themselves witnessed it happening on a KSS Adoptee forum of which we are members.

Tragically DKRG has a track record of maligning and demonizing any other Korean Adoptees who have done important work in the field of Korean Adoption. If you pledge your fealty to them, you are safe; but if you disagree in the slightest with Peter Møller or Boonyoung Han, then they have been known to kick Adoptees out of DKRG / TRC Facebook groups (even those with active TRC cases) and to spread false and malicious rumors about said Adoptees (like yours truly) to their various closed groups. The amount of trauma caused in the Adoptee community in the lead up to the TRC investigation was massive, and I can only imagine how I might have felt if I were actually Danish. I am actually holding back in not saying everything I know here about Peter Møller’s history. But I may not always do so. Publicly, Peter Møller signs all of his missives with “Love, Peter”. This is akin to an abuser who only punches below the neck in order to hide the bruises, yet publicly attempts to appear to be a saint. It’s disgusting.

I am sure that after reading this, Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han may attempt to spread further false and malicious rumors about me. But don’t just take my word for it regarding the bad behavior of DKRG - see the letter posted publicly by the producers of the Danish documentary team of TV2, in the section called “Danish TV2 Media Producers Call Out Peter Møller of DKRG” at the bottom of this page.

Above: Screenshot of my email to Bastiaan Flikweert on February 6th, 2022, sharing with him the Paperslip site, which contained my original KSS K-Number research. The site was not a public website at the time. This email followed a Zoom in which I had shared (unfortunately) my original KSS K-Number research with Bastiaan in confidence, which DKRG’s Peter Møller would later falsely credit him for, despite Peter’s knowing that I did this research myself. Peter also shared KSS K-Number to a non-KSS forum, which he definitely had not asked permission to do. This research was previously NOT public and was NEVER meant to be shared with non-KSS Adoptees.

Above: This screenshot of a private messenger conversation between myself and Peter Møller on August 29th, 2022, clearly shows that Peter FULLY KNEW that I had told Bastiaan Flikweert about my KSS K-Number research BEFORE Peter gave FALSE CREDIT to Bastiaan for my research on January 1st, 2023, on a DKRG forum from which I had been blocked by Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han, but of which Bastiaan is still a part.

Below is a screenshot of one of my posts to a Korean Adoptee forum from September 14th, 2022, where I demonstrate support for DKRG’s Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han. Pictured is Bastiaan Flikweert (Left) and Peter Møller (Right). The image is blurred as I don’t really need to see more pictures of an angry looking Peter Møller. He’s outraged due to INJUSTICE! </ sarcasm >

I made many such posts to Korean Adoptee forums in the early days of DKRG:

Below is a screenshot of one of my posts to a Korean Adoptee forum from October 28th, 2022, where I demonstrate support for DKRG and the TRC. I made many such posts to Korean Adoptee forums in the early days of DKRG. I believe this is the last post I made in support of DKRG before they BLOCKED me from ALL DKRG forums around one month later in December 2022 for no reason:


Below is a screenshot of when I was first discovering that I had been BLOCKED for no reason from ALL DKRG / TRC related forums, in early December, 2022. I had not even posted ANYTHING to the DKRG Blog forum, yet I found that I was blocked on December 7th, 2022:


Below is a screenshot of one of my MANY behind the scenes attempts to contact Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han after they had BLOCKED me from all DKRG forums for no reason, on or around December 4th, 2022. To this day, I have NEVER received any response or explanation from either Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han, despite having been in regular communication with them with NO DRAMA on my part prior to when they blocked me. As a result of their blocking me from all DKRG / TRC related forums, I was unable to get information directly about the progress of the TRC investigation, as DKRG was and is TRC’s mouthpiece for Adoptees. Since this time, DKRG had BLOCKED countless OTHER Korean Adoptees with ACTIVE TRC cases, meaning that these Adoptees - like me - are unable to get any information about the progress of the TRC investigation. I have since withdrawn my TRC case due to DKRG’s egregious behavior.

The “Jane” on this message is Jane Mejdahl, with whom I have had little interaction. I do not believe that Jane Mejdahl had a role in blocking me from DKRG forums, though she is also part of DKRG leadership, and as such, is aware of the fact that Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han have blocked MANY Korean Adoptees with active TRC cases from DKRG forums. I received no response to this message sent on December 4th, 2022 to Peter Møller, Jane Mejdahl, and Boonyoung Han:


ANATOMY OF A HIT JOB:

AFTER DKRG’s Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han had BLOCKED me from ALL DKRG / TRC related forums (see above), Peter Møller knowingly gave DKRG right-hand man Bastiaan Flikweert FALSE credit for my KSS K-Number research, which I had been conducting since 2020. Peter Møller, Boonyoung Han, and Bastiaan Flikweert were ALL aware that this was my research yet ALL tacitly accepted the deliberately false credit for my research given to Bastiaan Flikweert by Peter Møller. Bastiaan Flikweert is not even a Korean Adoptee, yet remains a part of all DKRG / TRC related forums from which MANY Korean Adoptees with ACTIVE TRC cases have been BLOCKED by DKRG.

Later in 2023, DKRG’s Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han would go forward to International Press about Switching - a larger topic which I had been researching since 2018. Boonyoung Han had been witness to my research since 2020.

Below is a screenshot of Peter Møller’s January 1st, 2023 post where he KNOWINGLY LIES and gives Bastiaan Flikweert FALSE CREDIT for my original KSS K-Number research:

Oh also, Cheers to Bastiaan Flikweert for this screencapture…despite having many partial screencaptures of Peter’s original post and his subsequent typically condescending responses to Danish Adoptee friends who defended my work, I did not have this screencapture in full before. I’m happy to, you know, give CREDIT for this screencapture, where it’s rightfully due.

Where this whole sordid ordeal began:
with a post on January 1st, 2023 by DKRGleaderPeter Møller to a closed DKRG forum from which I had been BLOCKED for no reason, despite having been one of the first of the 34 Truth and Reconciliation (TRC) Korean Adoption cases to be accepted by the S. Korean Government earlier in 2022, and despite having done nothing except help DKRG.

*EVERYTHING BOLDED in the quoted text by Peter Møller below is related to MY original KSS K-Number research, which Peter FALSELY attributed to Bastiaan Flikweert in this January 1st, 2023 post. I recall this day very explicitly, as the beginning of 2023 was severely ruined for me once I learned of this post from Danish  Adoptees.

Note that EVERYTHING BOLDED in the post below is related to my original KSS K-Number research. Without my research about first digit encoding of KSS K-Numbers per KSS’ Western Partner Adoption Agencies, DKRG’s / Bastiaan Flikweert’s supposedly “original finding” of illegality tied to the timeline of MATCHING to KSS’ Western Partner Adoption Agencies in KSS adoption cases is EFFECTIVELY MEANINGLESS.

You cannot prove an illegal timeline of the MATCHING of a child by KSS to one of KSS’ Western Partner Adoption Agencies WITHOUT KNOWING that KSS K-Numbers are ENCODED in the first digit per each of KSS’ Western Partner Adoption Agencies:

Peter Regel Møller

January 1, 2023

“New knowledge about the adoption process and timelines!

Bastiaan Flikweert, who is part of the TRC group, has done fantastic research shedding light on the adoption process.

Bastiaan has been to the museum and found KSS' book on all adoptions.

Bastiaan has noted that the K-numbers, the adopted individuals' journal numbers, contain coding for the predestination of the recipient country.

All adopted individuals to, for example, Holland received K-3, all to Denmark got K-5.

Regarding the adoption process, it has been a big mystery how the timeline for each adopted individual has been.

Adoption researcher Dr. S… has once again been of great help. He has found the old decree from 1967.

The decree states that a child can only be transferred with consent from both parents. If the parents cannot give consent, it must be done by a guardian (legal guardian), and transfer to the guardian must be documented.

If none of these conditions are met, it is by definition an illegal adoption.

If no consent document or consent for transfer to a guardian can be found, then it is an illegal adoption.

What does this have to do with the timeline? Bastiaan's new knowledge about the K-numbers moves the adoption process forward to intake because the child was already predestined to the recipient country at enrollment.

The 1967 Decree, which Dr. S… has found, prescribes the other procedures such as legal guardianship and release for adoption.

One might think that the adoption process would only begin when the child's guardian or custodians had given consent and approval for adoption had been granted.

But that is not the case. The child is already predestined for adoption before the guardian is appointed and before the child is approved for adoption.

We know from the quota system that the 4 adoption agencies had a distribution of how many children they could send out for overseas adoption and for domestic adoption.

The quota system was an expression of how much the adoption agencies were required to "provide" at set minimum prices set by the state.

Afterwards, each adoption agency could predestine children to recipient countries themselves - without actual prior matching - and without having guardianship or prior approval for the child to be sent for overseas adoption.

Thus, paperwork, as you find in your adoption papers, was of secondary importance. They were actually made for the sake of the adoption procedure.

If you are from KSS, check for yourself. If you are from Denmark, your journal number starts with K-5…

The new knowledge shows that the child was already predestined for a recipient country at enrollment with KSS, and as such, there may not have been a thorough adoption process.”

A lie is only masterful if you can disguise the motivation…

1 year after I told Bastiaan Flikweert about my KSS K-Number research and decoding, which related directly to my case, Peter Moeller of DKRG deliberately gave him FALSE credit for my research on a forum from which I was blocked. This situation was not resolved until over 1 YEAR later, when ONLY due to public pressure, Bastiaan Flikweert FINALLY publicly admitted he had NO ROLE in my KSS K-Number research. He still has not apologized for refusing to resolve this matter even privately with me when the incident first occurred on January 1st, 2021.

February 6th, 2020:

I shared the link and password to www.paperslip.org - which was in 2020 still a password protected site and contained a summary of my KSS K-Number research - with non-Adoptee Bastiaan Flikweert, the son of two Dutch KSS Adoptees who both later privately admitted knowing they each witnessed my doing the KSS K-Number research on a private KSS Adoptee forum.I had told Bastiaan Flikweert about my KSS K-Number research during a Zoom in early February 2020, prior to the email (BELOW) I sent to Bastiaan and his mother, who would later, with his father, form the Netherlands Korean Rights Group - NLKRG. Both of Bastiaan’s parents and another future NLKRG member would later pressure me to allow Bastiaan to KEEP the false credit given to him by DKRG’s Peter Moeller - pressure which of course I refused to accept.I could never understand why they pressured me so much - to the point of bullying - to allow Bastiaan Flikweert to KEEP the FALSE credit assigned to him for my research. I can’t prove a connection, but in August 2024 I learned that NLKRG - whose 4-5 governing members are just Bastiaan Flikweert, his parents, and one or two other Dutch KSS Adoptees - received significant funding from both the Dutch AND Korean Governments for their adoption related work.

January 1st, 2021:

Peter Moeller gives false credit for my KSS K-Number research to Bastiaan Flikweert on one of the DKRG forums from which I had been blocked for no logical reason. As of 2024 I have never received any explanation or apology from Peter Moeller or Boonyoung Han as to why they completely blocked me out of the DKRG / TRC movement. Both Peter Moeller and Boonyoung Han were WELL aware that I had done the KSS K-Number research BEFORE Bastiaan Flickweert was falsely credited for it. Boonyoung Han had contributed her OWN KSS K-Number to my research, yet she has never once tried to correct this situation. It is worth noting that while Peter Moeller and Boonyoung Han present themselves publicly as “defenders” of Adoptee Justice, with a SPECIFIC focus on Holt and KSS - they have NEVER ONCE mentioned Paperslip, which is to date the ONLY website in the world about KSS history and past and current practice - in the MYRIAD press opportunities they have had since 2022. Odd that there would be such an “oversight”, no?

Above: screenshot of Messenger conversation from January 1st, 2023 AFTER Peter Møller first gave FALSE credit to Bastiaan Flikweert for my original KSS K-Number research on a DKRG forum from which I had been blocked for no reason.

I gave Bastiaan the benefit of the doubt and
messaged him IMMEDIATELY, as multiple Danish Adoptees let me know this was going on, and I asked him to correct Peter’s false attribution of credit for my research to Bastiaan. I had told Bastiaan about my KSS K-Number research via Zoom in February 2022, and had asked him to keep it confidential, which he did NOT.

Unfortunately it has taken over ONE YEAR to resolve this messy issue. Fortunately, after publicly calling him out on the one forum which we share in common, and pressure from a non-DKRG co-researcher, Bastiaan has FINALLY ADMITTED that he had NO role in my KSS K-Number research. See the bottom of the page for his response from February 17, 2024.

Above: Screenshot of my email to Bastiaan Flikweert on February 6th, 2022, sharing with him the Paperslip site, which contained my original KSS K-Number research. The site was not a public website at the time.

Below: I tried VERY hard to resolve this situation QUIETLY behind the scenes, on January 3rd, 2023 when I emailed my common acquaintance with Bastiaan Flikweert. I never heard back from this person which only exacerbated my anxiety over the situation which would not be resolved for over one YEAR. It wasn’t until I
went in person to Korea in July 2023, MONTHS later - during which time, this issue remained unresolved and unaddressed - that I had an in-person conversation with the person I had emailed about this issue. Again, I could not address this issue directly with Peter Møller after he and Boonyoung Han had BLOCKED me from all DKRG forums and had refused to reply to any of my attempts at communication (which is egregiously how DKRG treats everyone whom they arbitrarily decide to discard). I had also tried and failed to get Bastiaan Flikweert to correct Peter Møller’s false attribution to him of my original KSS K-Number research, and had been told by Bastiaan Flikweert that “there was no evidence for your (my) decoding (of KSS K-Numbers)” - despite me being the one to tell him about my research! So writing to the person who had introduced me to Bastiaan Fliweert was my next, and ultimately also failed attempt to resolve things PRIVATELY and IMMEDIATELY after the “incident” had occurred. I should note that this person who had introduced me to Bastiaan Flikweert did finally agree in person in July 2023 to credit Paperslip in any future publication about KSS K-Numbers, but it was only after a very difficult conversation, during which it was unexpectedly extremely difficult to get this person to understand the necessity of giving proper credit for my research.

To be clear, this is the FOURTH person to have been FULLY AWARE that I had done the original KSS K-Number research, yet for whatever motivation, had tacitly refused (at least for MONTHS) to help resolve the situation.

This situation has unfortunately damaged a valuable relationship with this person for me, which is yet another casualty of DKRG’s and Bastiaan Flikweert’s irresponsibility:

Above: On January 3rd, 2023, I sent this email to a common connection between Bastiaan Flikweert and I, in an attempt to resolve this issue privately. I never heard back, and was only able to discuss the issue with this person in July 2023 MONTHS later in Korea during IKAA. During that entire time, this issue was left to fester unresolved.

”Thanks once again for your help with the TRC! 

I'm not sure how much we discussed my K-Number research when I was in Korea, but something which has come up is that Peter Moller has recently given Bastiaan Flikweert credit on a DKRG forum for de-coding the KSS K-Number first digit codes. 

I messaged Bastiaan directly, who told me that there was "no evidence" that I had done the K-Number research. This is egregious considering that nearly the entire KSS Adoptee community online is well aware of my original K-Number research since 2020. There is extensive documentation of my research on the main KSS Adoptee forum…

…two different KSS Adoptee forums, the first with 823 members, and the second with 192 members. The majority of the members of both forums are well aware of the original K-Number research which I have been conducting on the main forum since 2020. The K-Number research came about directly because of my twin's switch case, and I ended up collecting and analyzing the K-Numbers of nearly…KSS Adoptees, which is how I figured out that KSS' K-Numbers were encoded. 

After I realized that I might have had a twin who died at KSS, I took one entire year to research the case - this was in 2020, before I came back to Korea in 2021 and found...A huge part of that year was researching KSS K-Numbers, with the help of another KSS Adoptee who can vouch for all of our research.  

…reporter…is well aware of my K-Number research, as I discussed it with him as part of my twin's switch case, with our conversation recorded in Korea on film in 2021 (it has not been aired or published anywhere). 


The KSS community and I have not wanted the fact that KSS K-Numbers were encoded public, but I decided to trust Bastiaan with this information after you introduced us early this year with good intentions. At the time, Bastiaan was not even aware of what KSS' Western Partner Adoption Agencies were. I shared with him the password to Paperslip, which was at that time a totally password protected site, only open to Adoptees. The K-Number research was a part of that site at the time. Bastiaan said that he would not share that the KSS K-Numbers were encoded, after I explained my research to him. 

I'm really disappointed in Bastiaan and will be even more so if Peter goes public with the information about KSS K-Numbers and publicly credits Bastiaan through the press. 

I would write to Peter directly, except for the fact that he has cut off all communication for no reason. Unfortunately, this has been his pattern with other Adoptees who have submitted their cases for the TRC. 

I just wanted to let you know, because I am sure that DKRG will want to take credit for my original research. I would definitely come forward publicly if this becomes the case. 

I'm sorry to bring this to your attention, but it disappoints me greatly that Bastiaan is not being honest and correcting Peter in crediting Bastiaan for decoding KSS' K-Numbers. 

Every KSS Adoptee online knows that I did this original research since 2020. We have not made it public…

I hope that you understand. 

Best…”

Above: An email from DKRG’s Boonyoung Han on June 9th, 2021, before DKRG even existed (so far as I know). I had reached out to Boonyoung when visiting Korea in 2021, as she is also a KSS Adoptee and I knew that she was a long time activist in Korea. I didn’t know much about her beyond that at the time, but our email exchanges were very friendly, and we went to Shabu Shabu in Seoul, and she tried to convince me to move to Korea to become an activist. We got along just fine and had no problems - I was not aware of ANY issues she had with me until DKRG got underway. Then I began to hear rumors about how much Boonyoung was the one who wanted me BLOCKED from all DKRG forums, even though many of my Danish Adoptee friends strongly wanted me to be a part. But I never had any kind of falling out with Boonyoung before she simply blocked me out of the DKRG movement for reasons which neither she nor Peter Møller have ever bothered to explain.

What is notable about the email above is first, that Boonyoung had contributed her OWN K-Number information to my KSS K-Number research, likely in 2020, or earlier in 2021 - so she was VERY well aware that I was responsible for the KSS K-Number research, as it had been conducted on a KSS forum to which she and I both belonged - and I had reached out to her directly to participate.

She refers in this email to my interest in sharing my research into KSS’ K-Number system with the broader public, which I was then cautious to do due to the privacy concerns of KSS Adoptees - but the vast majority, like Boonyoung, were in favor of doing so, so long as personal privacy was protected.

On January 1st, 2023 when Boonyoung’s (for) now husband Peter Møller knowingly gave FALSE credit to Bastiaan Flikweert on a DKRG forum from which I was blocked, Boonyoung would have been VERY WELL AWARE that this was going on, as she and Peter manage all of the DKRG forums. So Boonyoung Han, Peter Møller, and Bastiaan Flikweert ALL KNEW that I had done the original KSS K-Number research, but ALL were complicit in pretending that Bastiaan Flikweert had done MY research. It just really makes me sick to think about…

Above: Screenshot showing my welcoming Boonyoung Han (who had not yet become part of DKRG, which to my knowledge did not exist at the time) on October 11th, 2020. At the time that I invited her as a presumably non-switched supporter of the forum for Switched Adoptees, I did not know she would later ruthlessly take credit for my research into Switching along with Peter Møller, when they both took Switching to international press in 2023.

Note that Boonyoung writes:

“Thank you - I will check-in with you before speaking/writing/doing anything related to your group and the issue of being switched.”

Boonyoung clearly conveniently forgot about this when she and Peter went forward to international press about Switching in 2023. Do you really think that I believe that there was a justifiable reason for my ouster from DKRG? NO - Boonyoung Han and Peter Møller simply wanted credit for all the research I had been doing into Switching. They got it, by going forward to international press about Switching after effectively ousting me from the DRKG / TRC movement.

Let’s not forget Boonyoung Han’s role in wanting to take public credit for my years of research into SWITCHING. Boonyoung is NOT switched (to my knowledge) but knowing that she was a long-time activist in Korea (and not much else about her), I unfortunately invited her to be a part of a private forum of Switched Adoptees in 2020, which is 2 years after I created the group in 2018. Boonyoung never contributed anything to the forum, but I supported her KICA study by submitting my switch story and adoption documents for the study, as well as encouraging the other Switched Adoptees I know to do the same.

After hoovering up all of our documents and data for the KICA study, Boonyoung and Peter (who was also apparently involved in running the KICA study, which I did not know at the time) BLOCKED me from the DKRG / TRC movement, which I now realize was so they could take credit for my research into Switching in the Press.

You know what is kind of inconvenient sometimes? The TRUTH.

At top is a screenshot I dug up of a polite exchange between Peter Moller and I,
who on August 29th, 2022 talks about how I told Bastiaan Flickweert, unfortunately, in confidence during a Zoom in February 2022 about the codes in KSS K-Numbers, which I had discovered in 2020 through my original KSS K-Number research. I shared the Paperslip site with Bastiaan Flickweert when it was still a private, password protected site only for KSS Adoptees. Because he was the son of two KSS Adoptees, I thought that I could trust him with this information. Apparently I was wrong, because…

…How WEIRD that just a few months later, AFTER DKRG blocked me for no known reason from ALL DKRG / TRC related groups, that both Peter Møller and Bastiaan Flickweert conveniently forgot
that I did this research!

And how strange that Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han went forward to blast the news about Switching to multiple international press outlets after they blocked me from all DKRG / TRC forums and have never bothered to explain why - when my case is about Switching, and I’ve researched the topic for years!

Hinsight is unfortunately 20/20.

Above:

June 24, 2022 - KICA (Korea Intercountry Adoption) Study: 

I was recruited to participate in the KICA study around June 2022. Since Boonyoung Han had been part of a forum for Switched Adoptees which I had invited her to join as a “supporter” in 2020, I am sure that this was the reason why I was invited to join this study - so that Boonyoung Han and her research team could collect the information I had gathered about Switching since 2018. I agreed to participate in the study and referred many Switched Adoptees I know to participate in this study. I even did an interview with a researcher based in Jeju, Korea via Zoom on July 15th, 2022 for the study.

After hoovering up my personal adoption documents and information about my switch case through this study starting in June 2022, Boonyoung Han and Peter Moller would come to BLOCK me from ALL DKRG / TRC forums by December 4th, 2022 - just a few MONTHS later.

Note that Peter Moller is yet again listed as a “lawyer” on this document. It is apparently ILLEGAL in Denmark to present yourself as a lawyer when you are NOT.This is just one of MANY places where Peter Møller credits himself or is credited as a “lawyer”. But according to many Danish Korean Adoptees, and according to the site
Advokat Samfundet website where all Danish lawyers are listed - yet Peter Regel Møller is not - Peter Møller is not a lawyer at all. According to Danish Korean Adoptees, Peter Møller is apparently only a PARALEGAL and NOT a LAWYER.

After BLOCKING me from ALL DKRG / TRC related forums on December 4th, 2022 - just a few MONTHS after my participation in their KICA study - Peter Regel Møller and Boonyoung Han would later go forward to international press about Switching, a topic which affects neither of their personal adoption cases directly.

A truly masterful hit job by these two self-styled “defenders” of “Adoptee Rights” - (claps with one hand).

Why NOT LYING About The REAL Source Of Research MATTERS.

It's "funny", on January 1st, 2023 when Peter Møller gave FALSE credit for my original K-Number research to Bastiaan Flickweert, who is the son of two KSS adoptees who themselves fully *admit* to witnessing my doing the KSS K-Number research (since this research was done basically in real time on a forum of several hundred KSS Adoptees), several DKRG supporters messaged me to say that "It doesn't matter!" who did the research. For his part, Bastiaan Flickweert never corrected this false attribution FINALLY came forward to set the record straight on February 17th, 2024, after more than one YEAR of NOT doing so - and ONLY in response to public pressure.

How is it NOT important for a group like DKRG which is supposedly dedicated to “Adoptee RIGHTS” to ACTUALLY TELL THE TRUTH???

As if it was not enough for DKRG to BLOCK me from all DKRG / TRC forums when I had an ACTIVE TRC case, Peter Møller KNOWINGLY LIED and gave one of his footsoldiers, Bastiaan Flikweert, FALSE CREDIT for my research. Then as though that was not enough, apparently DKRG “demonized” me to their cult-like following, when I could not defend myself as I was blocked from their forums. This whole situation has caused me a lot of trauma, and frankly, makes me SICK.

Get the actual facts HERE:
KSS K-Numbers

Bastiaan Flikweert FINALLY Publicly ADMITS on February 17th, 2024 That He Did NOT Do The KSS K-Number Research After Over One YEAR Of Irresolution. But He ONLY Does This After Exhausting Public Pressure.

February 17th, 2024:

Below is Bastiaan Flikweert’s message posted to a Korean Adoptee forum on February 17th, 2024. While I am glad that this issue had finally been resolved in terms of Bastiaan’s admission that he never played ANY role in my original KSS K-Number research, he also did not exactly apologize for the fact that this admission has come over one YEAR after I had originally asked him privately to correct Peter Møller’s false attribution of credit (see screenshot at the top of this page). This FINALLY public admission only came AFTER my calling him out on a shared Adoptee forum (of which Bastiaan, who is a non-Adoptee, is inexplicably a part), and from pressure from a non-DKRG co-researcher of Bastiaan’s who agreed to hear my side. I could NOT previously address this issue with him on any other Adoption related forum of which we were both members, because I had been BLOCKED from all forums related to DKRG. This deliberately uneven ground was sordidly why Bastiaan took over one YEAR to admit to the truth - because he had never had to face me on a shared forum where I had equal footing. So for those who see Bastiaan’s FINAL admission as “brave” - let’s be reminded that Bastiaan could easily have resolved this with me privately over one YEAR ago, yet chose NOT to. I doubt that he ever would have come forward to admit the truth - that he had no role in my original KSS K-Number research - had I not been able to call him out publicly over a year after the initial LIE was made by Peter Møller. This is not academic integrity - this is THEFT that both Peter and Bastiaan thought that they could get away with because they thought they had SILENCED me, because I am a WOMAN, and I am an Adoptee.

I wish that this had been resolved a LOT sooner, but am glad that it has been finally resolved.

Below: Bastiaan Flikweert’s admission after more than one YEAR of NOT setting the record straight, that he had NOTHING to do with my original KSS K-Number research:

Postscript:

While this issue has been resolved to the extent that I think it can be with Bastiaan Flikweert - even though he stopped short of apologizing - I know that I will likely never receive an apology nor explanation from DKRG’s Peter Møller or Boonyoung Han as to why they blocked me out of the DKRG movement when I had an active TRC case. Though I can certainly guess that they were afraid I would outshine them. When Peter first approached me in August 2022, I was the ONLY Adoptee who had dug so deeply into KSS history and practices. DKRG has a pattern of blocking people whom they fear may gain more attention, and that is TRULY sad.

It’s also sadly funny how Peter Møller has not, and likely never will step forward to defend Bastiaan by taking his fair share of the blame for falsely crediting Bastiaan with my research. I wish I could say that I feel sorry for Bastiaan, but Bastiaan has been silent witness to how Peter Møller and Boonyoung Han have treated me and countless other Adoptees with active TRC cases in their kicking us off of their DKRG / TRC forums. I guess if you decide to run with snakes, you can’t be surprised if you get bitten by one…

I also have my theory on why I think it took Bastiaan Flikweert so long to FINALLY publicly acknowledge that he had not done the KSS K-Number research, but that I had:

Why did Bastiaan Flikweert REFUSE to acknowledge that I had done the original KSS K-Number research for so long, only admitting that I deserved the credit after being publicly called out on an Adoptee forum, over one year after I had asked him to?

You might defend him by saying that he was too afraid of Peter Møller to contradict him - but Bastiaan’s arrogance in ignoring me when I saw him in person at the IKAA adoption conference in Korea in July 2023 speaks to his own less innocent motives.

I think that it was possibly too much for Bastiaan to resist to be able to claim that he and Dr. S… had made the original discovery of the illegal timeline of Matching in KSS adoption cases. In order to prove that illegal timeline, he would HAVE to ALREADY KNOW that the first digit of KSS’ K-Numbers were encoded per KSS’ Western Partner Adoption Agencies, in order to recognize in the KSS books that he was fleetingly shown by a librarian - who turned the pages for Bastiaan and Dr. S… , and allowed no photographs except pages of statistics - that children were being MATCHED by KSS to Western Partner Adoption Agencies PRIOR to when they should have been according to a legal adoption timeline. I seriously doubt that Bastiaan could have figured this all out in the fleeting moments of looking at this KSS book under supervision by a librarian - and in fact, I know that he DID NOT figure this all out on the spot, because by the time he had found the KSS books, I had already told him of my KSS K-Number research in February 2022. Dreaming you discovered something is NOT THE SAME as ACTUALLY discovering it.

It should be pointed out that, even though I was not thinking of anything to do with specifically illegal timelines, I had figured out in January 2021 that KSS was encoding “orphan” children with encoded K-Numbers per the MATCHED Western Partner Adoption Agency at the “Feeder Orphanage” level - before the children ever arrived physically at KSS in Seoul. So while Bastiaan and Dr. S…
certainly made the connection in terms of an illegal timeline, neither one of them were the first to notice that KSS was MATCHING children it intended to send overseas for adoption with encoded K-Numbers BEFORE they ever arrived physically at KSS.

Don’t just take my word for it regarding DKRG’s bad behavior - check out the experience of the Danish TV2 Media Producers with DKRG’s Peter Møller:

Danish TV2 Media Producers Call Out Peter Møller of DKRG for Bad Behavior.

Posted August 6th, 2023 to Korean Adoption forum (bolds mine):

There was a recent Danish documentary by TV2 called "Secret in the Shadow Archive". I was fortunately able to see major parts of it thanks to a Danish connection. It's a great documentary covering falsification of Danish KSS adoption cases.

Unfortunately this fantastic and heartbreaking documentary can only be seen in Denmark:

https://play.tv2.dk/serie/hemmeligheden-i-skyggearkivet-tv2?fbclid=IwAR1Z43bqmtxFeRDVDIz6G8ZUOQQLI7sm9zgZJ8PwKgJFMtSYuHicphtm1yE

Unfortunately TV2 has had to contend with issues related to DKRG leadership. They released this letter which was shared with me by a Danish KSS Adoptee:

Translation via ChatGPT / original Danish letter attached:

"Dear all,

It is with great regret that we find ourselves compelled to write this post after attempting dialogue. Unfortunately, TV 2 Documentary sees no other option. In a series of posts on DKRG's Facebook page, DKRG's Peter Moller has made a number of undocumented and untrue allegations about TV 2's working methods and ethics in producing a documentary about adoptions from South Korea. These claims have naturally created doubt and uncertainty among the adoptees that TV 2 has spoken with - and especially among those who have agreed to participate in the documentary's recordings, including the planned recordings on May 14, 2023.

DKRG accuses TV 2 of causing offense to its members by engaging in dialogue with them, and alleges that some members have "leaked" others' contact information to TV 2. TV 2 Documentary has refuted these accusations in phone conversations with Peter Møller and through email, providing evidence to show that the accusations are incorrect and baseless. Since it has not been possible to find a resolution where DKRG corrects the false claims for the 649 members of their group, and since TV2 cannot respond to the posts in the closed group, TV 2 is compelled to address DKRG's allegations publicly.

It is deeply concerning and problematic that DKRG is spreading misinformation about TV 2's treatment of vulnerable sources and such a serious topic. TV 2 Documentary has extensive experience working with vulnerable sources, and we fully understand that it can be difficult for some adoptees to discuss their cases, and that many do not want publicity on this matter. Therefore, TV 2 has only contacted adoptees and inquired about their cases when the adoptees themselves have given their consent to speak about their experiences.

In fact, DKRG even helped facilitate contact between their members and TV2 when they posted an announcement in their Facebook group in early September, seeking participants for the documentary.

We are completely puzzled as to why DKRG felt the need to make these untrue statements when both DKRG, its members, and TV 2 should share the same goal: to thoroughly investigate adoptions from South Korea and uncover the truth as best as possible.

If anyone feels that TV 2 Documentary has not lived up to the aforementioned considerations, they can contact editor Nils Bomann at nils@tv2.dk or at 51563474.

Feel free to share this post in other relevant groups."

Below is a screenshot of the original letter by Danish TV2 producer Nils Bomann.

Screenshot of the letter posted online by Danish TV2 producer Nils Bomann.

 


Recognize any familiar themes here?
Peter Møller actually appears in the Danish TV2 documentary (as he appears in most media regarding Korean adoption these days) and originally assisted in helping refer Danish Korean Adoptees to the TV2 producers. We had heard from other Danish Adoptees that Peter Møller began to kick Adoptees off of DKRG / TRC related forums EN MASSE once he realized that he was not in total control of who contacted TV2 about their documentary.

It’s funny because the bewildered tone of Danish TV2 producer Nils Bomann’s letter reflects the same bewildered feeling I first had when I discovered I had been - for no reason - blocked from all DKRG / TRC related forums while my TRC case was STILL ACTIVE.

But now I know that this is the standard modus operandi of DKRG leadership: not only to use and then lose people, but also to demonize anyone whom they don’t completely control or whose information they wish to falsely attribute to themselves or to one of their supporters.

You Know, This All Catches Up With You Eventually…

Dear Peter Møller, Boonyoung Han, Bastiaan Flikweert and other DKRG “leaders” and supporters who poorly behave: At first I was shocked at the behavior behind the scenes of DKRG, but now I am just angry. I would like to be in support of the work that DKRG is doing, but you are doing serious intentional damage below the neck to the Danish Korean Adoptee community, and to the Korean Adoptee community at large. Those bruises from your below-the-neck punches are growing and they are seriously starting to SHOW.

And you know what? At some point, all of this just catches up to you. When you remove and block hundreds of Korean Adoptees from private forums which are supposedly dedicated to “Adoptee Rights”, at some point, you just seem unintelligent. And you lose the support and respect of the few people you have NOT YET blocked from your “Adoptee Rights” forums. If I have one piece of advice for DKRG, it is this: GROW UP. DO BETTER. APOLOGIZE. Because your time in the spotlight won’t last long if you continue to fail the Korean Adoptee community with your egregious behind-the-scenes behavior. Or worse - for you - you will be in the spotlight for reasons for which you don’t WANT to be.

Below: Literally the future of DKRG if they don’t learn to treat Korean Adoptees with more respect. This is NOT a joke screencapture. It’s reality.